Legal Opinion
Sciolino v. Marine Midland Bank-Western
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 4, 1979No. CIV-75-523PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
ELFVIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff is the president of an automobile dealership, Main Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. (“Main”), which fell upon hard times in 1974. On December 3, 1974, pursuant to a security agreement between it and Main, Marine Midland Bank-Western (“Marine”) exercised its option under New York’s Uniform Commercial Code § 9-503 and physically took over the operation of Main through Marine’s agents, William Taylor, Richard Diana and Charles Schumacher. Marine then proceeded to dispose of Main’s collateral under section 9-504. Plaintiff strenuously objected to such…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Albert J. Doherty v. American Motors Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Schowengerdt v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Woods v. McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Wright v. National Bank of StamfordDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1985
- Maduka v. ParriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.