Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Gejewski

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1932No. 23001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

(Kinkade, J.).

John Gejewski filed

an application with the Industrial Commission, seek ing compensation for an injury claimed to have been sustained in the course of his employment. The commission rejected the claim for want of jurisdiction, arising out of the fact that the injury complained of was not sustained in the course of employment. Application for rehearing was filed and allowed, and thereupon a referee was designated by the commission to take and report the evidence. Upon the coming in of the evidence, a rehearing was had upon which the commission adhered to its first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Renkel v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Industrial Comm. of Ohio v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Industrial Commission v. PolcenOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mossman v. Cincinnati cityCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API