Industrial Comm. of Ohio v. Russell
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The record discloses that the defendant in error was employed at the Strand Theatre in Cincinnati as an operator of moving picture machines; that the machines were operated by electric light of great intensity and brilliancy, throwing the most powerful ultra-violet light rays, at and through which Russell was compelled at all times to look, that during the latter part of the year 1918 he noticed that his eyesight, in both eyes, was becoming affected by such light; that after January 25, 1919, he left his occupation and received treatment for his failing vision, and on or about…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Renkel v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by18 opinions
- Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Burns v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Industrial Commission v. FrankenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Burns v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Industrial Commission v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.