Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bankers Reserve Life Ass'n v. Scott

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1899No. 11,054PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original application for mandamus to require respondent to allow and sign a bill of exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

The question raised by this record is not a very perplexing one. The action is an application to this court, in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, for a writ of mandamus commanding Hon. Cunningham R. Scott, one of the judges of the district court for the fourth judicial district, to allow and sign a bill of exceptions. The respondent, in his return to the alternative writ, sets out at length the proceedings had before him in the case of Finn against Bankers Reserve Life Association, and, in justification of his refusal to sign the bill of exceptions presented to him for allowance in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Secrist v. PettyIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. People ex rel. Crofut v. GibbonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  3. Wallace v. BostonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  4. Muirhead v. MuirheadCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1847

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KidderNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Kehr v. KehrNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Weil v. Federal Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API