Legal Opinion

Indiana State Highway Commission v. Curtis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1998No. 37A05-9711-CV-498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The Indiana State Highway Commission and State of Indiana (“State”) appeal the trial court’s order on a motion to enforce a settlement agreement in the action filed by Carl and Lorraine Sutton against them. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

ISSUES

1. Whether the State is bound by the settlement agreement.

2. Whether the settlement agreement is supported by sufficient evidence.

3. Whether the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees to the Suttons for the fees incurred in enforcing the settlement agreement.

FACTS

The Suttons owned real estate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. StewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Donavan v. Ivy Knoll Apartments PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Klebes v. Forest Lake Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. FeigelIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indiana State Highway Commission v. CurtisIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Max Yanoff v. Glenn Muncy etalIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. PersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API