Indiana State Highway Commission v. Curtis
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Indiana State Highway Commission and State of Indiana (“State”) appeal the trial court’s order on a motion to enforce a settlement agreement in the action filed by Carl and Lorraine Sutton against them. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
ISSUES
1. Whether the State is bound by the settlement agreement.
2. Whether the settlement agreement is supported by sufficient evidence.
3. Whether the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees to the Suttons for the fees incurred in enforcing the settlement agreement.
FACTS
The Suttons owned real estate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamlin v. StewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Donavan v. Ivy Knoll Apartments PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Klebes v. Forest Lake Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. FeigelIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Indiana State Highway Commission v. CurtisIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Max Yanoff v. Glenn Muncy etalIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. PersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998