Powell v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Justice.
Appellant, Robert Powell, appeals his conviction for indecency with a child. We agree with appellant’s contention that the introduction of a videotaped interview of the child complainant, in accordance with TEX. CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 38.-071, §§ 4 and 5 (Vernon Supp.1985), violated appellant’s right to confrontation under TEX. CONST. art. I, § 10 and the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution. We accordingly hold that the procedure set out in article 38.071, sections 4 and 5, is unconstitutional, reverse the conviction in the present case and remand the cause for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGuire v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Rhea v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- State v. In the Interest of R.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.