Legal Opinion

Powell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 28, 1985No. 05-84-00646-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Justice.

Appellant, Robert Powell, appeals his conviction for indecency with a child. We agree with appellant’s contention that the introduction of a videotaped interview of the child complainant, in accordance with TEX. CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 38.-071, §§ 4 and 5 (Vernon Supp.1985), violated appellant’s right to confrontation under TEX. CONST. art. I, § 10 and the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution. We accordingly hold that the procedure set out in article 38.071, sections 4 and 5, is unconstitutional, reverse the conviction in the present case and remand the cause for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McGuire v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Rhea v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. State v. In the Interest of R.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API