Legal Opinion

Amerisure Companies v. Statesman Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1991No. C-900593PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal, the transcript of the docket, journal entries and original papers from the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, and the briefs and arguments of counsel.

Plaintiff-appellant, Amerisure Companies (“Amerisure”), filed a complaint for contribution against defendants-appellees, Safeco Insurance Company (“Safeco”), Statesman Insurance Company and State Automobile Insurance Company (jointly “Statesman”), for costs incurred in settling two cases filed against an insured. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Safeco and Statesman.

On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Buckeye Union Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Shelby Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Bazdar v. Koppers Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United National Insurance Company v. Sst Fitness CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. Travelers Insurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Hi-Land Apartments, Inc. v. City of HillsboroOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. United National Insurance Company v. Sst Fitness CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API