Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Pulaski Investment Co.

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is the second appeal of this condemnation case. See Arkansas State Highway Comm’n v. Pulaski Investment Co., 265 Ark. 584, 580 S.W. 2d 679 (1979).

On this appeal the Arkansas State Highway Commission argues two errors: The owner and appellee introduced testimony contrary to a pretrial motion in limine; there is no substantial evidence to support the $ 152,000.00 verdict.

Relevant portions of the motion in limine read:... the defendants, its witnesses and its attorney [are prohibited] in the trial of this cause from testifying, arguing, or in any way making…