Legal Opinion

Maas v. Lonstorf

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1908No. 1,816PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan.

1Opinion of the Court

BURTON, Circuit Judge.

This bill was filed for the purpose of compelling the defendant below, George J. Maas, to convey to the complainant, Mrs. Margaretha Bonstorf, an undivided one-sixth interest in certain parcels of land described in the bill, and for the purpose of compelling him to account to her for her proportion of all rents, profits, and royalties received by him on account of her undivided interest in the lands standing in his name and managed by him on joint account. The bill also sought an account of a fund placed in his hands to be used in taking options for purchase or lease of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Thomson v. DeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Vincent v. PleckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Real Property Co. v. PittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Rector v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Lynde v. VoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. Baltimore & OR Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API