Legal Opinion
Baltimore & OR Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1946No. 5459PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBIE, Circuit Judge.
Earl Saunders (a citizen of West Virginia) instituted, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, a civil action for damages against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (hereinafter called B. & O.), a Maryland corporation. The object of this action was to recover money damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by Saunders in a collision between a motor truck in which Saunders was riding and an engine and train owned and operated by B. & O. The truck, at the time of the collision, was owned by United Fuel Gas Company…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- La BourgogneSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Mayor of Vicksburg v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Brown v. CranstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- American District Telegraph Co. v. KittlesonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Baltimore & OR Co. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Blair v. Cleveland Twist Drill Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.