Legal Opinion

Morrison v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 26, 2000No. 998C306PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

We are called upon to review the court of appeals' decision in People v. Morrison, 985 *670P.2d 1 (Colo.App.1999). The court held that a defendant is not entitled to a new trial if he exhausts his peremptory challenges but does not exercise a peremptory challenge on a juror who he originally challenged for cause.1 We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals upholding the defendant's convictions but do so on different grounds.

The central issue of this case is resolved under well-settled principles of law governing challenges for cause issued by a criminal defendant. We hold that the trial court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Carrillo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. People v. MacRanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Harris v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. People v. ShreckColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. WhitmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. People v. RichardsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2002

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API