Legal Opinion

Challacombe v. Commissioners of Highways

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Bond county; the Hon. W. E. Hadley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Shirley

delivered the opinion of the court.

The abstract of the record fails to comply with rule 23 of this court which requires a complete indexed abridgment of the record. There appears in the abstract no exception to the judgment nor assignment of the errors relied on for a reversal, and this court might in its discretion well refuse to examine the record for errors and exceptions. Mayer v. Schneider, 112 Ill. App. 628.

On turning to the transcript of the record, however, we find the exception to the judgment preserved and among the alleged errors well assigned is the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of East St. Louis v. East St. Louis Gas Light & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Badger v. Inlet Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. People ex rel. CalvinIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Mayer v. SchneiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. Road District No. 1Appellate Court of Illinois · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brownell Improvement Co. v. Highway CommissionerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  2. Folkers v. ButzerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  3. Merle v. BeifeldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API