Velasquez v. Ralls
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentStephens, Judge
Because I conclude that the trial court did not make the necessary findings of fact on all relevant factors listed in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50A-207,1 respectfully dissent.
Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50A-207, a court “may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if it determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances, and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50A-207(a) (2005). The statute further provides:(b) Before determining whether it is an inconvenient forum, a court of this State shall consider whether it is appropriate for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Diaz v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- In re J.A.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Rosenthal's Bootery, Inc. v. ShavitzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980