Legal Opinion · Dissent

Velasquez v. Ralls

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 2008No. COA08-102Published

1DissentStephens, Judge

Because I conclude that the trial court did not make the necessary findings of fact on all relevant factors listed in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50A-207,1 respectfully dissent.

Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50A-207, a court “may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if it determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances, and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50A-207(a) (2005). The statute further provides:(b) Before determining whether it is an inconvenient forum, a court of this State shall consider whether it is appropriate for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. In re J.A.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Rosenthal's Bootery, Inc. v. ShavitzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API