Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Faulkner Wood Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 29, 1988No. Civ. 6377PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

The trial court found that the two employees in this case were not entitled to workmen's compensation benefits.

The employees appeal. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Two issues are presented on appeal. The first one is whether Theoluster Pugh was an employee of the defendant. The second one is whether Nathaniel Oliver, who was stipulated to be an employee of the defendant, suffered an injury resulting from an accident in the course of his employment.

The trial court found that Pugh was not an employee and that Oliver was not injured from a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnett v. Britling Cafeteria Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Washington v. Warrior Tractor & Equipment Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Sun Papers, Inc. v. JerrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Moesch v. BALDWIN CTY. ELEC. MEMBERSHIP CORP.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Foy v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. ArvinMeritor, Inc. v. HandleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  2. St. Anthony Hospital v. JamesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Secor v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. Barrett v. Lee Brass Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. Evans v. HANDI-MAN TEMP. SERVICES & RISCORPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API