Legal Opinion

In Re Fountain

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 2008No. 07-BG-377Published

1Per curiam

In 2005, the respondent, Darryl K. Fountain, was suspended 1 by the Supreme Court of Delaware after admitting to serious and repeated violations of that jurisdiction’s Rules of Professional Conduct. That same court subsequently disbarred respondent by default after he failed to answer further disciplinary charges. 2 In sum, and most significantly, respondent either admitted to having or was found to have, repeatedly failed his fiduciary and financial obligations, repeatedly misappropriated client funds, falsified records, and failed to file tax returns for several years.

While the respondent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re SumnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. In Re FountainSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. In Re FountainSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API