Legal Opinion
Horesh v. DeKINDER
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 4, 2009No. A08A1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Judge.
Joseph Horesh appeals from an order awarding attorney fees against him and in favor of Samuel and Cynthia DeKinder. Horesh claims that the trial court erred in granting the DeKinders’ attorney fees motion because: (1) the DeKinders failed to file that motion within 45 days following the trial court’s final disposition of the case, as required by OCGA § 9-15-14, and the trial court therefore lacked jurisdiction to consider it; and (2) his claims against the DeKinders were substantially justified. Finding that the DeKinders’ motion was untimely, we reverse.
“The question of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rocha v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Stallings v. ChanceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Standridge v. SpillersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- FAIRBURN BANKING COMPANY v. GaffordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- GMC Group, Inc. v. Harsco Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- RL BB ACQ I-GA CVL, LLC v. WORKMAN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Grady A. Roberts III v. First Georgia Community BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Clary v. City of StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Ashley Claxton v. Dale AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Grady A. Roberts III v. First Georgia Community BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.