Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Ranck

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 13, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Cedar Rapids Superior Court. — Hon. C. H. Robbins, Judge. • • Law action to collect rent alleged to be due under a lease, and for the value of improvements which, as a part of the rent consideration, were to be, but were not, made. Equity proceeding for injunction to restrain the lessee from removing his goods from the leased premises until rent should be paid.

1Opinion of the CourtWithrow, J.

One phase of this difficulty has heretofore been before this court in Wolf v. Ranck, 150 Iowa, 87, it being then determined that the proceeding for the enforcement of the landlord’s lien was brought at a time when no rent was due, and that the judgment entered by the lower court was erroneous. A full statement of the claims made in the pleadings is necessary to a proper understanding of the case.

On June 17, 1909, the appellee filed in the superior court of Cedar Rapids his petition for landlord’s attachment under a lease, in force between the parties for property in Cedar Rapids, covering the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daniels v. LoganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Wolf v. RanckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barret v. HeartfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. In re BradleyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1915
  3. Kimball v. Lincoln Theatre Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Skalowski v. Joe Fisher, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  5. Southern Textile Co., Inc. v. LevinConnecticut Superior Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API