Legal Opinion

People v. Harper

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1975PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

We hold that if there is to be an amendment of an accusatory instrument within the scope of CPL 100.45 (subd 3), there must be strict compliance with the prescriptions of that section.

Defendant was charged in a felony complaint with reckless endangerment in the first degree, menacing, harassment, and possession of a weapon. Following a preliminary hearing the People moved to reduce the reckless endangerment charge from first to second degree and further moved that the weapons charge be tried as a misdemeanor. The felony complaint was accordingly converted to an information, but no alterations…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. People v. McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. KeizerNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API