Legal Opinion
Ruhsam v. Ruhsam
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 14, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1429PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
The subject of this appeal is a post-divorce order directing appellant to continue child support payments for his three children until each “of the said children reaches the age of twenty-one or become emancipated by marriage, or dies.” It was appellant’s position that the recent legislative change in the age of majority to eighteen years of age relieved him of an obligation to support his children beyond such age.
The parties were divorced in 1970 and incorporated into the decree and made a part thereof was a 1969 agreement regarding their property and children. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Baker v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re Dos Cabezas Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Shoaf v. ShoafSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Rosher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schmitz v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Ruhsam v. RuhsamArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Finn v. FinnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Hastings v. HastingsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Daugherty v. DaughertyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.