Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Julian

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1972No. Nos. 71-633, 71-668 and 71-669PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

The history of the human race is, in part, the effect of prejudice upon motives and purposes. Nowhere is this more sharply illustrated than in the treatment of the illegitimate child. Over the centuries he has been the innocent object of prejudice transferred from the guilt of his conception. As a consequence of the sin of his parents, he was legally the child of no one. As his and his mother’s needs for care and maintenance became an increasing charge upon society, statutes were adopted to shift that burden to the natural father.

So it was that one of the first acts of the Third General…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Glona v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Labine v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gammon v. CobbSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Jordan v. Delta Drilling CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Johnson v. NormanOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hall v. RosenOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Spada v. PauleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API