State v. . Satterwhite
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Long, J., at September Term, 1920, of BUNCOMBE. The defendant was convicted and sentenced for selling spirituous liquors, and appealed. Said appeal not having been docketed here at the spring term, as required, the Attorney-General moves to dismiss.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
This case was tried at September Term, 1920, of Buncombe. Not having been docketed here till this term, the motion of the Attorney-General to dismiss should be allowed as a matter of course. At his option, th.e case might have been docketed and dismissed under Rule 17, at last term.
The only point, however, raised by the defendant in his brief is “Appellant assigns error that the judgment imposed is uncertain, indefinite, conditional, alternative, and contingent in respect to the time the said judgment shall go into effect and be executed upon the person of the defendant.”
If the case was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- In Re BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . CatheySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- State v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- In Re HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. DoughtieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. CorlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.