Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smith v. Sage

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1998No. 98-657PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the following reasons.

First, Am.Sub.S.B. No. 2, 146 Ohio Laws, Part IV, 7136, does not apply to persons convicted and sentenced prior to July 1, 1996, and the court of appeals properly refused to retroactively apply the sentencing provisions of Am.Sub.S.B. No. 2 to Smith. State ex rel. Maynard v. Corrigan (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 332, 333, 691 N.E.2d 280, 281; State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 186, 188, 677 N.E.2d 347, 349.

Second, former R.C. 5145.02 created no legal duty on the part of either Judge Sage or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Lanham v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Maynard v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Recker v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Miller v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Jones v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State ex rel. Recker v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API