Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Miller v. Leonard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2000No. 99-1487PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. There is no constitutional or inherent right to be released before the expiration of a valid sentence. Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex (1979), 442 U.S. 1, 7, 97 S.Ct. 2100, 2104, 60 L.Ed.2d 668, 675; State ex rel. Hogan v. Ghee (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 150, 151, 707 N.E.2d 494, 495. As the court of appeals held, nothing in Am.Sub.S.B. No. 2 confers a mandatory right to parole. Finally, the sentencing provisions of Am.Sub.S.B. No. 2 (146 Ohio Laws, Part IV, 7136) do not apply to Miller and other persons convicted and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State ex rel. Hogan v. GheeOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. EatonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. State ex rel. Bailey v. Ohio Parole Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Swihart v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Chafin v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Miller v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API