Stilp v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY
Senior Judge KELLEY.
Unlike the Majority, I believe that Respondents’ preliminary objections should be overruled. Section 1401 of the County Code1 provides, in pertinent part, that *713“[t]he Commonwealth shall annually reimburse each county with a full-time district attorney an amount equal to sixty-five percent of the district attorney’s salary.” 16 P.S. § 1401(p). As a result, I believe that Stilp possesses standing to prosecute the instant matter as a taxpayer of this Commonwealth. See, e.g., Common Cause/Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth, 710 A.2d 108, 116…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Zemprelli v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Common Cause/Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- League of Women Voters v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.