Legal Opinion
In Re DT
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 29, 1999No. 99-052Published
1Opinion of the Court
743 A.2d 1077 (1999)
In re D.T.
No. 99-052.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
October 29, 1999.
Motion for Reargument Denied November 22, 1999.
Michael Rose, St. Albans, for Appellant-Mother.
Charles Martin of Martin & Associates, Barre, for Appellant-Father.
William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, Montpelier, and Howard W. Stalnaker, Assistant Attorney General, Waterbury, for Appellee SRS.
Daniel Albert, Public Defender, St. Albans, for Appellee Juvenile.
Present AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.
SKOGLUND, J.
Mother appeals from a family court decision that held D.T. is a child in need of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In re M.C.P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- L.G. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Gochey v. Bombardier, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In re B.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- In re D. P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.