Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Parrott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 13, 1956No. 315PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabNHill, C. J.

Plaintiff’s action as alleged in her complaint is an action for damages for personal injury proximately resulting from the negligence of the defendant in performing an operation on her. The only allegation in the complaint which gives any indication it is an action for damages proximately resulting from an alleged technical assault or trespass upon the person of plaintiff is the allegation that the puncturing of the cysts on her ovary was unauthorized.

Dealing first with the cause of action alleged, it is to be noted that plaintiff made no effort in the court below to prove the defendant did…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Baxter v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Dicenzo v. BergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Hopkins v. ComerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Bennan v. ParsonnetSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gray v. GrunnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. LaCaze v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  4. West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Kaplan v. HainesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API