Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railroad v. Barnes

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1896No. 1,852PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The appellee’s complaint alleges that “the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the snm of $118.00 as wages from the 1st day of March, 1889, to the 22d day of April, 1889, which the defendant promised and agreed to pay to the plaintiff with interest thereon” from the daté last named. No bill of particulars was filed with the complaint. The pleading does not disclose whether the contract sued on was ex-ecutory or executed. It may be true that the appellant promised and agreed to pay the appellee $118.00 for wages during the period named, but that no services have ever been actually…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Higham v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Thomas v. DaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Plunkett v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Riley v. WalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Leach v. RhodesIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. v. CollinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. First Nat. Bank of Wilkes-Barre v. BarnumDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Evansville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. Evansville Belt Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Over v. Byram Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Southern Indiana Loan & Sayings Institution v. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API