Legal Opinion
Burger v. Social Security Board
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 15, 1946No. 355PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
This proceeding is brought to review a final decision of the Social Security Board holding that remuneration received by plaintiff James F. Burger subsequent to January 1, 1940, was for “agricultural labor,” as defined in the Social Security Act as amended in 1939, 53 Stat. 1373, c. 666, Title II, § 209, 42 U.S.C.A. § 409, and cannot for that reason be included in his “total wages” for the purpose of computing benefits payable to plaintiffs under the Act.
Section 205(g) of the Act provides for judicial review of the record made before the Board, and grants the District…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Miller v. BurgerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT DER HARLANDER BUAMWOLLSPINNERIE UND ZWIRN-FABRIK v. Lawrence Walker Cotton Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Foster v. FlemmingDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
- Mid-Continent Aerial Sprayers, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Ewing v. McLeanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.