Legal Opinion
City of Michigan City v. Brossman
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 14, 1937No. 15,686PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDudine, P. J.
— This was an action instituted by appellee Charles Brossman against appellant City of Michigan City for damages for an alleged breach of a contract by which appellant city allegedly employed appellee to prepare plans and specifications for and to superintend the construction of a sanitary sewer on Sheridan Beach, a section of Michigan City, Indiana.
The issues were formed by an amended complaint in one paragraph and an answer in general denial. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled.
The cause was submitted to the court for trial without a jury. The court made a special finding of facts and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Brown v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Lang v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- State v. PoulinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Downs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- STATE, PRR CO. v. Iroq. Cons. Dist. Ct.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
- State ex rel. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Iroquois Conservancy District CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.