Legal Opinion

Bilyeu v. Wood

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 21, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). ' On appeal chancery cases are tried de novo, and the findings of fact by the chancery court are allowed to stand unless they are clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. Leach v. Smith, 130 Ark. 465.

Tb invalidate a deed on the ground of the grantor’s mental incapacity, the proof must show that the grantor was incapacitated from intelligently comprehending and acting- upon the affair out of which the transaction grew, and that he did not intelligently understand and comprehend the nature and consequences of his act. In other words, the mental…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly's Heirs v. McGuireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
  2. Pulaski County v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Leach v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. McEvoy v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Reaves v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Braswell v. BrandonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  2. Culling v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Hunt v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Oliphant v. OliphantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Sharp v. OatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API