Legal Opinion

Pulaski County v. Hill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 30, 1911PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; John B. Ma/rtineau, Chancellor; 1. If Hill was insane as claimed, the right to redeem was personal to him, and did not descend to his widow and heirs. The strict letter of the statute controls, and no one has a right to redeem after two years unless specifically so provided.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; John B. Ma/rtineau, Chancellor; 1. If Hill was insane as claimed, the right to redeem was personal to him, and did not descend to his widow and heirs. The strict letter of the statute controls, and no one has a right to redeem after two years unless specifically so provided. Kirby’s Dig- § 7095; 51 Ark. 453J Id. 430; Id. 476; 17 Ark. 654; 52 Ark. 132; 66 Ark. 141; 77 Ark. 190; 70 Ark. 408; 92 Ala. 577; 94 Ala. 481; 84 Ark. 617. 2. The right to redeem after two years from the sale is barred by the judgment in ejectment. Kirby’s Dig. § 5998; 46 Ark. 272; 49…

1Opinion of the CourtFrauenthau, J.

This was an action originally instituted for the purpose of removing certain deeds as clouds upon the plaintiffs’ title to the land involved in this suit. Subsequently, the complaint was so amended that the sole remedy sought by this action was to redeem said land from a tax sale. The plaintiffs below were the widow and heirs of one John Hill, who acquired the land in controversy by purchase in 1878 and died in 1906. The land was gold on June 11, 1888, for the nonpayment of the taxes of 1887 to one R. W. Martin; and the defendants, who are appellants herein, claim title to the land under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Kelly's Heirs v. McGuireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
  3. Bender v. BeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  4. In re to Appoint a Guardian for StorickMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Snyder v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Taylor v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Barre v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. JeToCo Corp. v. Hailey Sales Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Schuman v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API