Legal Opinion
United States v. Roosevelt Parriett
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1992No. 92-5030PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
Roosevelt Parriett had his supervised release revoked for failing to pay restitution, testing positive for drug use, failing to submit monthly supervision reports, and failing to notify the probation office of a change in residence. Parriett contends that an amendment to the supervised release statute, requiring a mandatory term of imprisonment for certain violations of the conditions of supervised release, constituted an impermissible ex post facto law as applied to him. Parriett also argues that evidence of drug “use” is insufficient as a matter of law to establish…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ray Mychel Fender v. Charles Thompson, Warden Attorney General of the State of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Clyde M. Cooper, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Stuart Jeffrey PaskowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Larry J. MeeksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ricky Lee Woodrup, A/K/A Ricky Lee Woddrup, A/K/A Lee Woodrup, A/K/A Ricky L. Woodrup, A/K/A Rodney WoodrupCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Orlando J. Beals, Also Known as Jeffrey NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Michael ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.