Legal Opinion

Lee v. Dana Incorporated

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 30, 2024No. 3:23-cv-02072Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Tyrone Lee, Case No. 3:23-cv-2072 Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Dana Incorporated, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Dana Incorporated has filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Tyrone Lee’s First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 9). Lee filed a brief in opposition. (Doc. No. 10). Dana filed a brief in reply. (Doc. No. 11). For the reasons stated below, I deny Dana’s motion. II. BACKGROUND Dana is a global manufacturer of drive train system components. (Doc. No. 7 at 3). Lee worked as a Press Operator at…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API