Legal Opinion

Pursue Energy Corp. v. Abernathy

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2011No. 2009-CA-01794-SCTPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This Court must determine whether an oil company can deduct reasonable processing and investment costs from the payments made to royalty owners. If so, we must determine whether Mississippi Code Section 53-3-39 is applicable in calculating the damages owed to royalty owners for unreasonable deductions. We affirm the chancellor’s holding that reasonable processing and investment costs may be deducted from royalty owners’ payments. However, the chancellor erred in failing to apply Section 53-3-39 to calculate damages. Thus, we affirm in part, and reverse and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of DuckettMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Channel v. LoyaconoMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Aqua-Culture Technologies, Ltd. v. HollyMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hamilton v. HopkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Piney Woods Country Life School v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Glory Truong v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Tunica County, Mississippi v. Town of Tunica, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Jon A. Swartzfager v. Thomas R. SaulMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  4. T.C.B. Construction Co. v. W.C. Fore Trucking, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Marc B. Daniels v. J. Dennis CrockerMississippi Supreme Court · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API