Legal Opinion

In Re Metz'Estate

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1960No. 9705PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

100 N.W.2d 393 (1960)

Matter of the ESTATE of Wesley METZ, Deceased.

Herman IMEL, Proponent and Appellant,

v.

Maude METZ, Contestant and Respondent.

No. 9705.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

January 5, 1960.

Rehearing Denied February 17, 1960.

Roswell Bottum, Rapid City, L. E. Schreyer, Lake Andes, for proponent and appellant.

Morgan & Fuller, Mitchell, W. C. Zeitner, Armour, for contestant and respondent.

HANSON, Judge.

The validity of an instrument purporting to be the last will and testament of Wesley Metz is involved in this appeal. Metz died in a hospital in Rapid City on November 17, 1955. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Imel v. MetzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re Rowland's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Johnson v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McKiver v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Davies v. TomsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re the Estate of DokkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Black v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Connelly v. SherwoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re Blake's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API