Legal Opinion · Dissent

Paurley v. Harris

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1954No. 7927Published

1DissentBeckwith, District Judge

Reluctantly, but' most earnestly, do I dissent. The facts contained in the majority opinion are sufficient for this dissent, with this additional notation. The agreement between Mrs. Ferrell and the defendants was made June 30, 1947. Harris built the fence about August of 1947. The complaint was filed December 4, 1950 (three-years, six months).

For sixty-three years this court has consistently maintained and supported the rule that a boundary line established by agreement by conterminous owners, followed by acquiescence and possession for the full statutory period of time required to acquire…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bayhouse v. UrquidesIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Edgeller v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Campbell v. WeisbrodIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Steinhilber v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. O'Malley v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API