Legal Opinion
In re Turrell
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Aureal by Warren E. Hunt from an assessment made by commissioners against his property in the above entitled proceeding.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
These proceedings were instituted under the statute* relating to proceedings for the drainage of swamps, marshes and other low or wet lands, and for draining farm lands, and have proceeded to an assessment of the lands claimed to be benefited by the drainage ditch, as directed by section 10 of the act in question. This section provides for an appeal to the court by an aggrieved party; and an appeal was taken by Warren E. Hunt, whose land is assessed, and, in accordance with the statute, he has stated the following grounds of appeal:
“ First. Said appeal is taken upon the ground that the *504proceed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SandsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Armstrong v. . Village of Ft. EdwardNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of MorningstarNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Application for the Support of McMurray, New York County Courts1928
- State Ex Rel. Wammack & Welborn v. AffolderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
- Prucka v. Eastern Sarpy Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Prucka v. Eastern Sarpy Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1953