Gladden v. Columbiana Sav. Bank
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Judge. •
A few principles of the law governing the disposition of this appeal may well here be set down, towit:
1. “The relative rights of the plaintiffs and of the garnishee depend upon the status existing when the writ of garnishment was served.” Bloch Bros. v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. et al., 208 Ala. 523, 94 So. 562, 564.
2. “If a garnishee * * * relies on a general denial of indebtedness, and an issue is formed contesting his answer, on the trial of such issue * * * The only fact in issue is, whether when the garnishment was served, or at the time of answer [or at any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sloss v. GlazeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Allen v. WoodruffAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
- Bessemer Savings Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Fowler v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Gladden v. Columbiana Sav. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ginsberg v. GoldsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Darby v. McGregor (In Re Darby)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- Rohlf v. StruckmeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Gladden v. Columbiana Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939