Legal Opinion

State v. Crowe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1998No. 23325PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation. At the probation revocation hearing, incriminating statements made by the probationer to his counselor and probation officer were admitted. The appellant claims that admission of the statements at the hearing violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. We affirm the decision of the district court.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant John David Crowe (Crowe) was indicted on charges of lewd and lascivious conduct on September 25, 1990. He subsequently pled guilty to an amended charge of sexual abuse of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. HerreraIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. Hector B. Almaraz, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Weisel v. BEAVER SPRINGS OWNERS ASS'N, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. RoseIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. RadfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API