Legal Opinion
Virgil Dotson v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 3, 1984No. 83-3037PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Virgil Dotson, et al. (Dotson) are presently before this Court to appeal an order of the district court denying their motions for enforcement and modification of two stipulations into which they entered with the City of Toledo (The City) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Dotson contends that the district court erred in failing to judge HUD’s compliance with those stipulations in accordance with the standard of “all necessary, reasonable and appropriate steps” as required by the 1977 stipulation. Upon consideration of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brown v. NeebCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Bechtel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- City of New York v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Burlington Northern Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Michael Rosen v. Tennessee Commissioner Of Finance And AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.