Legal Opinion
United States v. Bechtel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1981No. 79-4194PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Bechtel Corporation, Bechtel Incorporated, and certain of their subsidiaries (“Bechtel”) appeal the entry of a consent judgment. The decree was entered in an antitrust action based on Bechtel’s alleged participation in the Arab boycott of Israel. We conclude that the acts of the government, taken after a stipulation consenting to the judgment was filed, do not require that Bechtel be relieved from its consent. We further find that the trial court did not err in determining that the decree is in the public interest. We affirm.
*662BACKGROUND AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. Gillette Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Wages v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Microsoft Corporation. United States of America v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Massachusetts v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.