Smith v. Willoughby
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
The amendment to the motion for a new trial contains two grounds. Ground 1 assigns error on the court’s refusal to grant what is described in this ground as a “motion to dismiss said action on the ground that no equitable jurisdiction had been shown.” Ground 2 complains that the court erred in refusing a motion by defendants’ counsel to strike Earl Rogers as a party defendant.
As to ground 1, the overruling of the motion to dismiss was not excepted to pendente lite, and is not a proper ground of a *94motion for a new trial. Savannah, Florida & Western Ry. Co. v. Renfroe, 115 Ga.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Riley v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Berry v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. RenfroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dover v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007