Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1950No. 16894PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Special ground 1 complains that the court erred in permitting the plaintiff to testify as to a conversation he had with his deceased brother, E. C. Smith, in which the plaintiff was allowed to relate the contents of an oral agreement had with the deceased as to a boundary line between their respective properties; the ground of objection being that, under the provisions of Code, § 38-1603 (1), the plaintiff was not competent to testify. It appears without dispute that the defendants hold title to the property adjoining the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Drawdy v. HestersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Smith v. MerckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Tietjen v. DobsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Wooten v. SolomonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Boynton v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Dade v. DadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Dollar v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Williams v. BlantonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  5. O'CONNOR v. BielskiSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API