Atterbury v. McGlinn
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
MacNeille, J.,
We are considering two rules for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The action is in assumpsit on a New York judgment against six defendants as copartners, trading as McGlinn & Company. The writ in the case before this eourt was served on two of the defendants, William J. Mc-Glinn and J. Russel Butler, who have filed separate affidavits of defense.
In the statement of claim, plaintiff alleges that she instituted an action against the same defendants in New York; that service of the summons and copy of the complaint was made “upon the defendants” and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roche v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- D'Arcy v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Parry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Fritz v. HathawaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.