Legal Opinion

Denman v. City of Idaho Falls

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1931No. 5693PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

—Appellant brought this action to recover damages for unfair competition under C. S., secs. 2532 and 2544. This appeal is from judgment of dismissal upon sustaining demurrer to fifth amended complaint and refusal of appellant to plead further.

The fifth amended complaint, after alleging the capacity of appellant as receiver and respondent as a municipal corporation sets forth the granting of a franchise on March 14, 1920, by respondent to the predecessor of appellant and the acquisition thereof by the corporation of which appellant is receiver. Such franchise granted the right to acquire and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swain v. FritchmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. City of Idaho Falls v. PfostIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Plummer v. City of FruitlandIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Wilcox v. City of Idaho FallsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1938
  5. Alpert v. Boise Water Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API