Sauder Custom Fabrication, Inc. v. Boyd
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In Caterpillar, Inc. v. Shears, 911 S.W.2d 379, 382 (Tex.1995), we held that “the law of products liability does not require a manufacturer or distributer to warn of obvious risks.” The principal issue in this case is whether the obviousness of a risk is to be determined from the perspective of an average person or an average user of the product. The proper perspective is that of the average user. Because the risk in this case was obvious to an average user, the lower courts’ judgments for the plaintiffs cannot be sustained.
Sauder Custom Fabrication, Inc. manufactured a fifty-foot-tall…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. ShearsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. McGuireTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Martinez v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Kelley v. Price-Macemon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Winterrowd v. Travelers Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Timpte Industries, Inc. v. GishTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- McLennan v. American Eurocopter Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Olympic Arms, Inc. v. Green, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
- Rodger Nelson Smith, Jr. v. Louisville Ladder Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.