Weiss v. Mutual Indemnity Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
If there are any substantial issues of fact for trial, summary judgment should not be granted. Thompson v. Dairyland Mut. Ins. Co. (1966), 30 Wis. (2d) 187, 140 N. W. (2d) 200; Hein v. State Farm Mut. Automobile. Ins. Co. (1966), 29 Wis. (2d) 702, 139 N. W. (2d) 611.
There appear to be misstatements on each of the three insurance applications. The appellant urges that these errors voided the policy as a matter of law, as in Delaney v. Prudential Ins. Co. (1966), 29 Wis. (2d) 345, 139 N. W. (2d) 48. The plaintiff, on the other hand, denies that the false statements were made by him and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Thompson v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Demirjian v. New York Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Stockinger v. Central National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Taluc v. Fall Creek Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lemke v. Larsen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Zepczyk v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Lemke v. Larsen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Williams v. Farmers New World Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022