Legal Opinion

Shinkle v. Nashville Improvement Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

By the bill filed herein on October 30, 1935, complainant, a resident of Ohio, seeks to have a vendor’s lien enforced on a tract of land which he conveyed to the Nashville Improvement Company, and also to have a lien declared on a water pipe line constructed on said premises.

The chancellor entered a decree in favor of complainant for the unpaid purchase money, and ordered the land sold to satisfy same, but decreed that complainant was not entitled to a lien on the pipe line. As to this latter ruling, the complainant has appealed.

After the cause had been heard and taken under advisement by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baltimore County Water & Electric Co. v. DubreuilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  2. Frazier v. East Tennessee Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lea v. Louisville & N. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Glover v. L. N.R.R. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Bryant v. FitzsimmonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  2. Williams v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. Nashville Water Co., Inc. v. DunlapTennessee Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API