People v. Lewelling
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.
*278We began a recent opinion with the observation that "[o]ne of the more disconcerting things that can occur at a criminal trial is the discovery that there is no CALCRIM instruction for the offense charged, thus requiring the judge-hopefully with the assistance of counsel-to formulate appropriate instructions from scratch." ( People v. Starski (2017) 7 Cal.App.5th 215, 218, 212 Cal.Rptr.3d 622.) That observation is apt here, as there is no CALCRIM instruction for Penal Code section 149,1 which criminalizes a "public officer who, under color of authority, without lawful necessity, assaults or…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Bedolla, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Perry, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- (HC) Reed v. BroomfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Burchell v. Faculty Physicians & Surgeons etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Fussy v. RTI SurgicalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.