Legal Opinion

Overlock v. Jerome-Portland Copper Mining Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1926No. Civil No. 2388PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— This is an action brought by appellants, plaintiffs below, against appellees, defendants below, to ..compel the defendant, Jerome-Portland Copper Mining Company, to recognize plaintiffs’ certificates of stock, and to require that company and its receiver to transfer such certificates on the books of the company and thus give plaintiffs a standing as stockholders of such company.

According to the pleadings and agreed statement of facts plaintiffs are bona fide owners of such certificates of stock, having bought in the open market and paid a valuable consideration therefor. The defendants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lee v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. First Avenue Land Co. v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Gordon v. CummingsWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Rolapp v. Ogden & Northwestern RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Frame v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ong Hing v. Arizona Harness Raceway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Gulf Mortgage & Realty Investments v. AltenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Jeng-Cheng Ho v. Shih-Ming HsiehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Hirschfeld v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Belt v. BeltIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API